SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(KER) 44859

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
A. K. Jayasankaran Nambiar, J
M/S CHEMMANUR INTERNATIONAL JEWELLERS – Appellant
Versus
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER – Respondent
WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) 36944/2016



Dealers paying compounded tax under the KVAT Act are exempt from purchase tax under Section 6(2) for the specified goods.

Headnote:

Tax - Gold Ornaments Dealers - KVAT Act - Sections 6(2), 8(f) - The court interpreted amendments clarifying tax liabilities, affecting how compounded tax impacts purchase tax obligations.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners are gold ornament dealers who opted for tax payment on a compounding basis under the KVAT Act. They challenged notices for unpaid purchase tax, asserting the compounded tax should exempt them from the purchase tax liability.

Finding of the Court:

The court ruled that the amendment to Section 6(2) of the KVAT Act clarified that dealers paying compounded tax under Section 8(f) are not liable for purchase tax on those goods, thus supporting the petitioners' position.

Issues: Whether dealers paying compounded tax under Section 8(f) are liable to pay purchase tax under Section 6(2) of the KVAT Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The amendment to the KVAT Act made clear that compounded tax payments absolve dealers of additional purchase tax liability for the goods specified.

Final Decision: The writ petitions are allowed, quashing the impugned purchase tax assessments and penalties.

J U D G M E N T

The petitioners in all these writ petitions are dealers in gold ornaments, who had opted for payment of tax on compounding basis under Section 8 (f) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act [hereinafter referred to as the “KVAT Act']. For the assessment years 2013-14 onwards, the Assessing Authorities, while completing the assessments pertaining to the petitioners, took a stand that insofar as the tax payable at the concessional rate under (f) of the KVAT Act is in lieu of tax on sale, and not in lieu of purchase tax under Section 6 (2) of the KVAT Act, the said tax under (2) would be payable by the dealers on regular W.P.(C).No.36944/16 & connected cases basis, and assessed under a regular assessment. In these writ petitions, the pre-assessment notices, the penalty notices, assessment orders and penalty orders issued to the petitioners by the adjudicating authority under the KVAT Act, are called in question, to the extent, they propose the levy of purchase tax under (2), and imposition of a consequential penalty, on the ground that the payments of tax on compounded basis under (f) of the KVAT Act, will not exonerate the dealer from the liability to purchase tax under (2) of the KVAT Act.

2. During the pendency of these writ petitions, the Kerala Finance Act, 2017, was enacted with effect from 1.4.2017. Through the said Act, Section 6 (2) of the KVAT Act was amended by inserting the following proviso to (2)(a), namely, “provided that notwithstanding anything contained in clause (f) of Section 8 , a dealer paying compounded tax for the goods mentioned in that clause, shall not be liable to pay tax under this sub section on such goods with effect from 1st April, 2013”.

The amendment aforementioned has the effect of clarifying that, W.P.(C).No.36944/16 & connected cases dealers paying tax on compounded basis under Section 8 (f), need not pay tax under Section 6 (2) of the KVAT Act, on the goods in question, with effect from 1.4.2013. In view of the amendment with effect from 1.4.2013, these writ petitions are allowed, by quashing the impugned notices that propose an assessment to purchase tax, the impugned orders, to the extent, they confirm a demand of purchase tax and the impugned penalty orders, to the extent, they are based on the aforementioned assessment orders. The respondent shall do the needful in finalising the assessments and penalty proposals in relation to the petitioners on the basis of the observations in this judgment.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top