HIGH COURT OF KERALA
ALEXANDER THOMAS, J
FATHIMAKUTTY – Appellant
Versus
PULIKKAL MUHAMEDKUTTY – Respondent
J U D G M E N T
The prayers in this petition filed under the enabling provisions contained in Art.227 of the Constitution of India are as follows: “i) To stay all further proceedings in E.P.38/2016 in O.S.63/2006 pending before the Sub Court, Tirur;
ii) Issue such other orders or directions as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
2. Heard Sri.N.Deepa, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. In the nature of the order that is proposed to be passed in this petition, notice to the respondents will stand dispensed with.
3. Smt.N.Deepa, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits on the basis of the instructions of her party that Ext.P-3, which is an appelable order, is not challenged in this petition and that the petitioners will be filing appeal before the District Court, Tirur, to challenge Ext.P-3 order dated 23.11.2017 on E.A.No.412/2016 in E.P.No.38/2016 in O.S.No.63/2006 on the file of the file of the Sub Court, Tirur, within a period of 10 days from today along with an application for grant of stay and that until orders are passed thereon, the impugned execution proceedings in E.P.No. 38/2016 may be directed to be ke
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.