HIGH COURT OF KERALA
SUNIL THOMAS, J
vs
O R D E R
The petitioner herein stands arrayed as accused in CC No.762/2017 of JFCM , Kunnamangalam Police station for offences punishable under section 380 IPC .
2. The allegation of the prosecution was that, 7/9/2017, while the second respondent, who is the defacto complainant, was in the hospital, the petitioner herein removed the bracelet of the child of the defacto complainant. Alleging the commission of crime, the complaint was laid and the petitioner was arrested. She is in custody since then. The petitioner has approached this Court on a premise that, the dispute with the second respondent has been amicably settled. To substantiate it, the petitioner relied on Annexure 2 affidavit affirmed by the defacto complainant.
3. The learned counsel for the second respondent affirmed the execution of the above affidavit and stated that the second respondent was duly compensated by the petitioner and she has no objection in quashing the proceedings.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that, oral instructions have been received from the defacto complainant to the effect that she has no grievance against the petitioner herein and that the matter has been settled.
5. It was submitted by t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.