SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(KER) 2118

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
SUNIL THOMAS, J
vs


Advocates:
SRI.K.A.SALIL NARAYANAN, SMT.VARSHA BHASKAR, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR C.N.PRABHAKARA

O R D E R

The petitioner herein stands arrayed as accused in CC No.762/2017 of JFCM , Kunnamangalam Police station for offences punishable under section 380 IPC .

2. The allegation of the prosecution was that, 7/9/2017, while the second respondent, who is the defacto complainant, was in the hospital, the petitioner herein removed the bracelet of the child of the defacto complainant. Alleging the commission of crime, the complaint was laid and the petitioner was arrested. She is in custody since then. The petitioner has approached this Court on a premise that, the dispute with the second respondent has been amicably settled. To substantiate it, the petitioner relied on Annexure 2 affidavit affirmed by the defacto complainant.

3. The learned counsel for the second respondent affirmed the execution of the above affidavit and stated that the second respondent was duly compensated by the petitioner and she has no objection in quashing the proceedings.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that, oral instructions have been received from the defacto complainant to the effect that she has no grievance against the petitioner herein and that the matter has been settled.

5. It was submitted by t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top