HIGH COURT OF KERALA
K.HARILAL, J
GOPALA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
ORDER
During the pendency of this revision filed against the conviction and sentence of the Revision Petitioner under Section 323 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code , (for short IPC ) the parties have settled the matter and have filed Crl.M.A. No.7020 of 2013 to the effect that the matter has been compounded. The said petition has been signed by the Revision Petitioners as well as the 3rd respondent/de facto complainant and their respective counsel. In the light of this, Crl.R.P. is disposed of and the judgments under appeal are set aside and the composition of the offence is recorded.
2. It is needless to mention that this composition shall have the effect of acquittal of the Revision Petitioner of the offence punishable under Section 323 read with 34 IPC within the meaning of Section 320 (8)
Cr.P.C.
Sd/-K.HARILAL JUDGE
K. HARILAL, J.
------------------
in Crl.R.P.No. 1901 of 2013 --------------------------------
Dated this the 25th day of September, 2013
ORDER
The Revision Petitioners are the accused Nos. 1 and 2 in C.C. No.886 of 2008 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Kasaragod as well as the appellants in Criminal Appeal No.135 od 2012 on the files of Additi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.