HIGH COURT OF KERALA
THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J
E V PAULOSE – Appellant
Versus
C ALEXANDER AGED 71 YEARS Advocate -SRI DESI MATTHAI – Respondent
J U D G M E N T
This appeal arises from the judgment dated 19.03.2011 in A.S. No.107 of 2003 of the Sub Court, Muvattupuzha.
2. The 1st respondent filed O.S. No.188 of 1998 for recovery of money based on a chitty transaction, originally in the Munsiff's Court, Ernakulam on 03.04.1995. The appellant-1st defendant and others contended that the said court has no territorial jurisdiction to entertain the suit. According to them, jurisdiction lay with the court at Jamshedpur since all the transactions took place there. Learned Munsiff, Ernakulam vide order dated 12.04.1996 held that the said court has no territorial jurisdiction to entertain the suit and directed that the plaint be returned. The 1st respondent was directed to take steps as per Rule 10A of Order VII of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short, “the Code”).
3. The 1st respondent filed I.A. No.1029 of 1998 under Rule 10A of Order VII of the Code on 27.02.1998 requesting that the plaint be returned. Learned Munsiff, Ernakulam ordered return of the plaint. As the learned counsel for the 1st respondent submits, plaint was returned on 27.02.1998. It was presented in the Munsiff's Court, Muvattupuzha on 02.04.1998.
4. The appellan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.