SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(KER) 20879

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
A. K. Jayasankaran Nambiar, J
SMS BUILDERS – Appellant
Versus
THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER – Respondent
WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) 3098/2017



The failure to follow natural justice by not providing a personal hearing invalidates the assessment order under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act.

Headnote:

Natural Justice - Writ Petition - Kerala Value Added Tax Act - Sections Relating to Assessment and Hearing - The court upheld the principle of natural justice, concluding that the failure to afford personal hearing before the assessment order was made was unlawful.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner challenged an assessment order under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, arguing that they were denied a personal hearing despite expressly requesting one in their response to a pre-assessment notice.

Finding of the Court:

The court determined that the assessment order was invalid due to a lack of compliance with natural justice, as the petitioner was not heard before the order was issued.

Issues: Whether the petitioner was denied a fair hearing in violation of the principles of natural justice before the assessment order was made.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that adherence to natural justice is essential, particularly in tax assessments, and the failure to provide a hearing renders the order void.

Final Decision: The court quashed the assessment order and directed fresh assessment after a hearing.

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has approached this Court aggrieved by Ext.P4 order, that was passed against it under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act , for the assessment year 2011-12. In the writ petition, the case of the petitioner is essentially that, before passing Ext.P4 order, the petitioner was not heard, notwithstanding that the petitioner had expressly sought for a personal hearing in the reply that was filed to the pre-assessment notice.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for the respondent.

3. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made across the bar, I note that while the petitioner had, in the reply that was submitted to the pre- assessment notice, specifically asked for a personal hearing, in the event of the Assessing Officer finding that the objections preferred by the petitioner were not satisfactory, the Assessing Officer appears to have proceeded to pass the impugned order, without hearing the petitioner, after receipt of the reply from it. It is therefore clear that the impugned order is vitiated by a non-

compliance with the rules of natural justice. Accordingly, I quash Ext.P4 order and direct the respondent to pass fresh orders of assessment under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act , in relation to the petitioner, for the assessment year 201-12. The respondent shall pass fresh orders as directed, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner. To enable the respondent to do so, I direct the petitioner to appear before the respondent, at his office, at 11 a.m. on 12.06.2017.

The writ petition is disposed as above.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top