HIGH COURT OF KERALA
A. K. Jayasankaran Nambiar, J
SMS BUILDERS – Appellant
Versus
THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER – Respondent
WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) 3098/2017
Natural Justice - Writ Petition - Kerala Value Added Tax Act - Sections Relating to Assessment and Hearing - The court upheld the principle of natural justice, concluding that the failure to afford personal hearing before the assessment order was made was unlawful.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner challenged an assessment order under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, arguing that they were denied a personal hearing despite expressly requesting one in their response to a pre-assessment notice.
Finding of the Court:
The court determined that the assessment order was invalid due to a lack of compliance with natural justice, as the petitioner was not heard before the order was issued.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was denied a fair hearing in violation of the principles of natural justice before the assessment order was made.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that adherence to natural justice is essential, particularly in tax assessments, and the failure to provide a hearing renders the order void.
Final Decision: The court quashed the assessment order and directed fresh assessment after a hearing.
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has approached this Court aggrieved by Ext.P4 order, that was passed against it under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act , for the assessment year 2011-12. In the writ petition, the case of the petitioner is essentially that, before passing Ext.P4 order, the petitioner was not heard, notwithstanding that the petitioner had expressly sought for a personal hearing in the reply that was filed to the pre-assessment notice.
2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for the respondent.
3. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made across the bar, I note that while the petitioner had, in the reply that was submitted to the pre- assessment notice, specifically asked for a personal hearing, in the event of the Assessing Officer finding that the objections preferred by the petitioner were not satisfactory, the Assessing Officer appears to have proceeded to pass the impugned order, without hearing the petitioner, after receipt of the reply from it. It is therefore clear that the impugned order is vitiated by a non-
compliance with the rules of natural justice. Accordingly, I quash Ext.P4 order and direct the respondent to pass fresh orders of assessment under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act , in relation to the petitioner, for the assessment year 201-12. The respondent shall pass fresh orders as directed, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner. To enable the respondent to do so, I direct the petitioner to appear before the respondent, at his office, at 11 a.m. on 12.06.2017.
The writ petition is disposed as above.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.