HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J
JOHNSON & JOHNSON LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
ASST COMMISSIONER – Respondent
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayers:
“i) call for the records connected with the case;
ii) issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ or order directing the respondent to consider Ext.P5 letter and return the defective F forms and grant six weeks time to the petitioner for curing the defects in F-Forms and to resubmit the same.
iii) issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ or order directing the Respondent to grant an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner before finalizing the assessment for the year 2008- 2009 under Section 25 of the KVAT Act as well under Rule 6(5) of CST ( Kerala Rules)
1957 iv)issue a writ of prohibition or other appropriate writ or orders restraining the respondent from completing the assessment proceedings for the year 2008-2009 under Section 25 of the KVAT Act for a period of six weeks.
v. Issue such other writ, order or direction which the Hon'ble Court deems fit and necessary in the interest of justice. ”
2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is having every right to have the defective 'F' Forms returned from the respondent/Assistant Commissioner, Comme
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.