IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Anil K. Narendran, Muralee Krishna S., JJ
Jini Paul – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. arguments on pending revisions by manager against education orders. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
The appellant, who is the petitioner in W.P.(C)No.31148 of 2025, has filed this writ appeal, invoking the provisions underSection 5(i) of theKerala High Court Act, 1958, challenging the judgment dated 20.11.2025 of the learned Single Judge in that writ petition, as modified by the order dated 06.02.2026 of the learned Single Judge in R.P.No.1675 of 2025. This writ appeal is one filed along with C.M.Application No.1 of 2026 to condone the filing delay of 58 days, which was condoned by a separate order dated 08.04.2026.
2. We heard arguments of the learned counsel for the appellant-petitioner, the learned Senior Government Pleader for respondents 1 to 6, the learned counsel for the 7th respondent Manager and also the learned counsel for the 11th respondent.
3. The learned counsel for the appellant-petitioner would submit that by the judgment dated 20.11.2025, the learned Single Judge disposed of W.P.(C)No.31148 of 2025, by directing the competent among the respondents to implement Ext.P17 order dated 30.10.2025 of the 3rd respondent Deputy Director of Education, Thrissur. The 7th res
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.