SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 27857

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
ANTECH-PRL (JV) – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.RANJITH VARGHESE, SRI.RAHUL VARGHESE, SMT.SANTHA VARGHESE, SHRI.GEO KENNEDY K., SHRI.RANJAN BABU JOSEPH, SRI.K.L.VARGHESE (SR.)
For the Respondents: SHRI.B.ASHOK KUMAR

JUDGMENT

This writ petition is submitted by the petitioner, being aggrieved by the steps taken by respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to invoke the bank guarantee furnished by the petitioner for the purpose of the contract entered into between the parties. Today, when the matter came up for consideration, it is submitted by the petitioner and the respondents that the arbitration clause has already been invoked and, as part of the same, an arbitrator has also been appointed.

In such circumstances, this writ petition is closed without prejudice to the contentions of the parties, to be decided by the arbitrator. As this Court has granted an interim order on 26.03.2025 not to encash Exts.P23 and P24 bank guarantees, the said interim order will continue for a period of three months, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall keep the bank guarantee alive.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top