IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
KIZHAKKUMPARAMBAN LIYAKKATH ALI – Appellant
Versus
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (INTELLIGENCE) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenges to composite gst notices for multiple years. (Para 1) |
| 2. precedents prohibit composite notices; quashing ordered. (Para 2) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is submitted by the petitioner challenging Exts.P4 and P5 consolidated Show Cause Notices which were issued by the 1st respondent and Ext.P6 Order in original which was issued by the 2nd respondent for multiple namely, 2017 to 2023. The main challenge raised against the sustainability of the same is that, issuance of a composite notice for multiple assessment years was found to be not legally sustainable as per the decision rendered by this Court in Joint Commissioner (Intelligence & Enforcement) v. M/s. Lakshmi Mobiles Accessories [2025 KHC OnLine 149] and Tharayil Medicals (M/s.), Thrissur v. Deputy Commissioner, Thrissur [2025 KHC OnLine 467]
2. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Central Government Counsel, learned Government Pleader and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents, I find merit in the said submission, in view of the fact that, such a finding was indeed entered into by the Division Bench of this Court in the decisions referred to above.
In such circumstan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.