SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 27915

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
S.MANU, J
ABDUL AZEEZ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
LA.APP. NO. 92 OF 2020 | LAR NO.13 OF 2010 | LAR NO.14 OF 2010



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.JOHNSON GOMEZ, SRI.C.UNNIKRISHNAN (KOLLAM), SRI.S.BIJU (KIZHAKKANELA), SRI.SANJAY JOHNSON, SMT. JANE MARIA TOMY
For the Respondents: ADV. REKHA C NAIR, SR.GP - R1, DSGI - R2

Appeal dismissed for non-payment of balance court fee, mandatory for maintainability.

Headnote:First Paragraph: Land Acquisition Act governs compensation disputes in appeals against lower court decrees. Claimant appealed sub court judgment on land acquisition compensation. Court found balance court fee unpaid, leading to procedural dismissal. Second Paragraph: Sole issue was compliance with court fee payment requirement for appeal maintainability. Ratio requires payment of requisite court fee as mandatory condition precedent. Third Paragraph: Appeal rejected due to non-payment of balance court fee.

JUDGMENT

Balance court fee has not been paid.

Therefore, the appeal is rejected.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top