SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 27965

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Anil K. Narendran, Muralee Krishna S., JJ
State Of Kerala – Appellant
Versus
Nisha Elias – Respondent
W.A. NO. 666 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Nisha Bose

A government servant's valid medical reimbursement claim cannot be denied on technical grounds, such as the date of formal empanelment of a specific hospital department, once the factum of treatment and medical necessity have been established.

Headnote:(A) Kerala High Court Act, 1958 - Section 5(i) - Constitution of India - Article 226 - Medical Reimbursement - Government Servant - Denial of claim on technical grounds - Recognition of hospital departments - Petitioner sought reimbursement for cancer treatment at a major medical institution - Reimbursement rejected by State on ground that the specific department was not empanelled during the period of treatment - Held, rejection is arbitrary - Medical claim cannot be denied merely because the hospital department inclusion was notified subsequent to the treatment period - Factum of treatment and validation by medical records are the primary requirements for reimbursement - (Paras 12, 13, 14)

Facts of the case:
The respondent (petitioner in the writ petition) was a High School Teacher who underwent treatment for cancer at a major medical college in Vellore. After submitting her claim for medical reimbursement, the State rejected it, citing that while the hospital was listed, the specific department where she received treatment was only formally approved for reimbursement via a government order issued after her treatment.

Findings of Court:
The Court held that technical hurdles cannot defeat the right to health and medical reimbursement for a government servant if the treatment was genuine and medically necessitated. The rejection of the claim was deemed arbitrary.

Issues: Whether the government is justified in denying medical reimbursement solely because the specific department of an empanelled hospital was formally recognized for reimbursement after the date of treatment.

Ratio Decidendi: Right to medical reimbursement cannot be denied on technical grounds like the date of formal empanelment of a specific hospital department, provided the treatment is proven, genuine, and certified by medical records. The precedent set by the Apex Court emphasizes that the factum of treatment is the real test.

Result: Appeal dismissed.

Table of Content
1. overview of the writ petition, the medical reimbursement claim, and the single judge's initial ruling against the government's rejection. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. appellate arguments regarding the applicability of government service rules and the validity of the single judge's findings. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. factum of treatment and government policy on hospital empanelment. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. application of supreme court precedent on medical reimbursement as a right, rejecting technical denials. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)

JUDGMENT

Anil K. Narendran, J.

1. Respondents in W.P.(C)No.26575 of 2025 are before this Court in this writ appeal invoking the provisions under Section 5(i) of the Kerala High Court Act, 1958, challenging the judgment dated 26.11.2025 of the learned Single Judge in that writ petition, which was one filed by the respondent herein petitioner, invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of certiorari to quash Ext.P7 communication dated 02.04.2025 and Ext.P8 communication dated 29.04.2025 issued by the 1st respondent State of Kerala, through the 2nd respondent Principal Secretary to Government, General Education Department, whereby the claim made by the petitioner for medical reimbursement stands rejected, for the reason stated therein; a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to forthwith sanction and disburse the petitioner the full amount of medical reimbursement claimed for the treatment she had undergone at Christian Medical College, Vellore, for the period from 10.11.2022 to 24.11.2022 and from 15.12.2022 to 01.01.2023, amounting to Rs.11,64,732/-, together with interest at such rate as this Court deems just and proper, from the date of submission of the claim till realisation; and to direct the respondents to pay reasonable cost and compensation to the petitioner for the mental agony, harassment and hardship caused to her due to arbitrary and unjust rejection and inordinate delay in settling the legitimate claim for medical reimbursement.

2. Going by the averments in the writ petition, the petitioner, while working as High School Teacher (Mathematics) at Amayanoor High School in Kottayam, underwent treatment from 10.11.2022 to 24.11.2022 at the Hematology Department of Christian Medical College, Vellore, incurring an amount of Rs.3,91,631/-, covered by Ext.P1 receipt dated 24.11.2022, as she was diagnosed with T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Lymphoma/Leukemia and Lung Cancer. She was readmitted on 15.12.2022 at the Hematology Department of Christian Medical College, Vellore, where she underwent treatment for T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Lymphoma/Leukaemia, Spontaneous Tumor Lysis Syndrome, Adenocarcinoma Lung and Oliguric Acute Kidney Injury and discharged on 01.01.2023, as evident from Exts.P2 discharge summary dated 01.01.2023. She incurred an amount of Rs.7,73,101.75 for that treatment, covered by Ext.P3 receipt dated 10.01.2023. The document marked as Ext.P4 is a copy of Government order dated 18.02.1997, whereby certain modifications were made to the Kerala Government Servants’ Medical Attendance Rules, 1960, as recommended by the 5th Pay Commission. The appendix-I to the said Government order contains the list of diseases and centres where treatment facilities are available and treatment charges of the procedures. Cancer treatment - Bone marrow transplantation for lymphoreticular and haematological malignancy – at Christian Medical College, Vellore is included in the said list under item No.IV. Vide Ext.P5 Government order dated 17.02.2014, the Government made amendments to Articles 249, 254 and 254A of the Kerala Financial Code Vol.I , in order to provide that 100% of the estimate cost for undergoing treatment/procedure for the diseases/procedures listed in Annexure-I, as certified by the institution where the treatment is to be taken, will be sanctioned to Government Servants’ as interest-free loan subject to the a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top