SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 28088

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, J
SURAJ BABU V. – Appellant
Versus
THE REGISTRAR, SUBORDINATE JUDICIARY HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682031 – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 34242 OF 2016



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.ARAVINDA KUMAR BABU T.K.,SMT.SANDRA SUNNY,SHRI.ARUN KUMAR M.A,SMT.FARAH JYOTHI PRADEEP
For the Respondents: SHRI.B.UNNIKRISHNA KAIMAL

Writ petition dismissed upon counsel's submission that it is not pressed.

Headnote:First Paragraph: No specific statutes analyzed. Petitioner, a suspended clerk, filed writ petition challenging disciplinary proceedings. Court recorded submission that petition not pressed. Second Paragraph: Issue: Challenge to suspension and enquiry order. Ratio: Petition withdrawn by counsel's submission. Last Paragraph: Writ petition dismissed as not pressed.

JUDGMENT Dated this 7 th day of April, 2026 The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition is not pressed. This is recorded. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top