SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 28108

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Ziyad Rahman A.A., J
Mariyamma DevassyKutty – Appellant
Versus
State Tax Officer – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 13852 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri.Akhil Suresh, Shri.Anuraj V. G., Shri.Rahul T., Smt.Kalliyani Krishna B., Shri.Amrith M.J., Smt.Anita Elizebth Babu
For the Respondents: Shri.Arun Ajay Shankar, G.P.

Section 16(5) CGST Act's non-obstante clause overrides Section 16(4) time limit if returns filed by 30.11.2021.

Headnote:The Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act), particularly Sections 16(4) and 16(5), governs the time limits for claiming input tax credit (ITC). The petitioner claimed ITC for the period October 2018 to March 2019 but faced denial via a show cause notice for late filing beyond Section 16(4)'s deadline. The court found the returns were filed on 27.11.2019 and 30.11.2019, within Section 16(5)'s extended cut-off date of 30.11.2021. The key issue was whether Section 16(5)'s non-obstante clause overrides Section 16(4)'s timeline. The court held that submission within Section 16(5)'s cut-off renders Section 16(4) insignificant, entitling the petitioner to ITC if otherwise eligible. The writ petition was allowed, quashing the show cause notice and directing reconsideration under Section 16(5).

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P2 show cause notice issued by the 1st respondent, by which, the input tax credit claimed by the petitioner pertaining to the period from October 2018 to March 2019 were declined on the reason that, the petitioner failed to submit the returns within the period stipulated in Section 16(4) of the CGST Act . The challenge is raised mainly on the ground that, the petitioner is entitled to claim the input tax credit in the light of Section 16(5) of the CGST Act , as the petitioner submitted the returns within the cut off date contemplated under the said provision, which is 30.11.2021. On going through Ext.P2 show cause notice itself, it is discernible that, the petitioner had submitted the returns during the period from October 2018 to March 2019 on 27.11.2019 and 30.11.2019. Thus, it is seen that the petitioner had submitted all the returns within the statutory period contemplated under Section 16. Section 16(5) contemplates a non-obstante clause as regards Section 16(4) and therefore, once the tax payer is submitting the returns within the cut off date contemplated under the said provision, the timeline stipulated under Section 16(4) losses its significance. In such circumstances, an interference is required.

Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of quashing Ext.P2 with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider the matter and grant the benefit of Section 16(5) of the CGST Act to the petitioner, if the petitioner is otherwise entitled.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top