IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
K.N. VELAYUDHAN – Appellant
Versus
TRIPPUNITHURA MUNICIPALITY – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court stays coercive action, directs appeal. (Para 4 , 5) |
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with following prayers; (i) “Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing Exhibit P13 order passed by the 1st respondent as the same is illegal, arbitrary and unsustainable.
(ii) Declare that Exhibit P13 order is void abinitio passed without assigning reasons and without affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and consider the Exhibit P11 representation with a time limit as fixed by this honourable court.
(iii) Dispense with the filing of the translation of vernacular documents.
(iv) Issue such other order or directions as are necessary in the nature of this case.” [sic]
2. The petitioner challenged Ext.P13 order.
Admittedly, it is an appealable order and therefore, I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition. At this stage, the counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner may be given a breathing time to challenge Ext.P13.
4. Heard the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.
5. I think that prayer can be allowed. But, I make it clear that I have not considered the matter on merit and the interi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.