Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 28287

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R. RAVI, J
AUGUSTINE JACKSON – Appellant
Versus
K A ABDUL JABBAR – Respondent
OP(C) NO. 3066 OF 2025|EA 160/2024|EP NO.29 OF 2018

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.ANIRUDH KADAVIL,SMT.MEGHA MUKUNDASWAR
For the Respondents: SRI.M.H.HANIS,SRI.RENOY VINCENT,SMT.T.N.LEKSHMI SHANKAR,SMT.NANCY MOL P.,SMT.NEETHU.G.NADH,SMT.RIA ELIZABETH T.J.,SRI.SAHAD M. HANIS

Mediated settlements are enforceable and form part of court judgment.

Headnote:No specific statutes analyzed as the matter was resolved through mediation. The parties entered into a mediated settlement in an original petition challenging execution proceedings from a prior decree. The court disposed of the petition in terms of the settlement. Issues related to execution proceedings were settled amicably. The ratio decidendi emphasizes enforceability of mediated settlements forming part of the judgment. The original petition is disposed of in terms of the settlement.

JUDGMENT

The parties were referred for mediation. The parties have entered into a mediated settlement. The copy of the memorandum of settlement has been forwarded to this Court by the Nodal Officer.

In view of the settlement arrived at, this original petition is disposed of in terms of the settlement. The memorandum of settlement shall form part of this judgment.

The parties shall abide by the terms of the settlement.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document