SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 28297

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
BABU C.K – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI. BEJOY JOSEPH P.J., SRI.M.VIJAYAKUMAR
For the Respondents: SRI.PREMCHAND R. NAIR, GP

Table of Content
1. petitioners challenge appointment approval refusal via revisions. (Para 1)
2. direct expeditious disposal with hearing opportunity. (Para 2)

Dated this the 10th day of April, 2026 JUDGMENT Aggrieved by Exts.P1 and P2 declining approval of appointment, the petitioners have preferred Exts.P5 and P6 Revision Petitions before the Government and the petitioners seek for an expeditious disposal of the same.

2. Heard the learned Government Pleader representing respondents 1 and 2.

After hearing both sides, I am inclined to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Exts.P5 and P6 Revision Petitions submitted by the petitioners, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioners and the 3rd respondent. A decision in this regard shall be taken within an outer limit of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top