SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 28317

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
M/S.HYDROTECH INDUSTRY & WORKS – Appellant
Versus
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 13444 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.PADMANATHAN K.V., SRI.R.SREEJITH, SHRI.MOHAMMED SHINAF A.
For the Respondents: SHRI.ARUN AJAY SHANKAR, GOVERNMENT PLEADER

Section 16(5) non-obstante clause overrides Section 16(4) time limit for input tax credit if filed by 30.11.2021.

Headnote:Section 73 of the CGST Act was invoked to deny input tax credit for returns filed from April 2018 to March 2019, citing non-compliance with Section 16(4) time limits. Petitioner challenged this relying on Section 16(5), submitting return on 28.11.2019 within the extended cutoff of 30.11.2021. Court found the denial erroneous as Section 16(5) overrides Section 16(4). Issue framed: Whether input tax credit denial under Section 16(4) holds when return filed within Section 16(5) cutoff. Ratio: Non-obstante clause in Section 16(5) renders Section 16(4) timeline insignificant if cutoff met, entitling claimant to credit. Writ petition allowed; impugned order quashed with direction to reconsider under Section 16(5) if otherwise eligible.

Table of Content
1. challenge to itc denial under section 73 citing section 16(4). (Para 1)
2. section 16(5) non-obstante overrides section 16(4) time limit. (Para 2)

JUDGMENT

This writ petition is submitted by the petitioner aggrieved by Ext.P3 order passed under Section 73 of the CGST Act . As per the impugned order, input tax credit claimed by the petitioner pertaining to the period from April 2018 to March 2019 were declined as the petitioner failed to submit the return within the period stipulated under Section 16(4) of the CGST Act . The challenge is raised by the petitioner mainly by relying upon Section 16(5) of the Act, which provides that, in case the tax payer is submitting the return within the cut off date contemplated under the said provision, which is 30.11.2021, such tax payer would be entitled to claim the input tax credit. In this case, it is discernible from Ext.P3 that, the petitioner submitted the return within the relevant period i.e., on 28.11.2019.

2. Therefore, it is evident that the petitioner has submitted the return before the cut off date contemplated under Section 16(5) of theCGST Actand hence, the petitioner is liable to claim the benefit of the same. This is particularly because, in Section 16(5) there is a non-obstante clause, as regards Section 16(4) and therefore, once the tax payer submits the return within the cut off date contemplated under Section 16(5) of the Act, the time line in Section 16(4) loses its significance. In such circumstances, I am of the view that some interference is required in this writ petition.

Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of quashing Ext.P3 with a direction to the 1st respondent to re-consider the matter and grant the benefit of Section 16(5) of the CGST Act to the petitioner, if it is otherwise eligible.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top