SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 28326

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
PALATHRA CONSTRUCTIONS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 14962 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.GEORGE A.CHERIAN, SHRI.RUBIN SHIBU, SMT.LATHA SUSAN CHERIAN, SRI.K.JACOB MATHEW, SMT.ARATHI PRABHAKARAN, SMT.ANNA ROSE NAMBADAN, SMT.ROSANNA C. WILSON, SMT.ANNA JOHNSON
For the Respondents: SHRI.BINOY DAVIS, G.P

Mandamus issued to direct expeditious decision on contractor's rate escalation representation due to material price surge.

Headnote:The petitioner, a contractor undertaking PWD works, faced escalated costs of bitumen due to war in West Asia, rendering quoted rates unviable. Reference made to prior 2018 Government relief for similar circumstances. Court directed consideration of representation for rate escalation. Issues framed as need for administrative decision on price escalation relief. Ratio: Courts direct expeditious disposal of representations on legitimate grievances without merits adjudication. Ordered 2nd respondent to decide representation within one month.

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is a contractor engaged in mainly PWD contract works. According to the petitioner, due to the outbreak of war in West Asia, the prices of the oil products, including bitumen, are increased considerably and hence, the petitioner is finding it difficult to carry out the works as per the rates already quoted by the petitioner. According to the petitioner, earlier when similar situation arose in the year 2018, the Government granted certain benefits to the contractors. In such circumstances, the petitioner is seeking escalation in the rates, taking note of the peculiar circumstances prevailing. The petitioner has already submitted Ext.P6 representation to the 2nd respondent. The limited relief sought by the petitioner is to direct the 2nd respondent to take a decision on the same.

After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government pleader for the respondent, I am of the view that, this writ petition can be disposed of, taking note of the limited nature of the relief. Accordingly, it is ordered that the 2nd respondent shall take up Ext.P6 representation and appropriate orders shall be passed within a period of one month from the date of receipt of copy of the judgment.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top