SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 28362

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Soumen Sen, CJ, Syam Kumar V.M., J
Muhammed Sidique – Appellant
Versus
Subi – Respondent
OP (RC) NO. 77 OF 2026|EP 266/2026|RCP NO.38 OF 2019



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri.Mithun P., Shri.Mohamed Amjad K.M, Smt.Merin Thomas

High Court directs expeditious disposal of stay petition in rent appeal considering pending execution prejudice to tenant.

Headnote:The Rent Control Court allowed the eviction petition ex parte under Section 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965, without evaluating bona fide need or alternative accommodation. Tenant challenged the order via appeal, alleging mechanical acceptance of landlord's evidence. High Court directed expeditious disposal of stay petition in appeal. Issues framed: whether eviction order ignored statutory tenant protections. Ratio: Appellate court to consider execution proceedings' prejudice to tenant when deciding stay. OP(RC) disposed directing expeditious hearing of stay without merits adjudication.

Table of Content
1. ex parte eviction order challenged; execution pending. (Para 1 , 2)
2. direct expeditious stay disposal without merits review. (Para 3 , 5)

The Rent Control Petition filed in 2019 was allowed ex parte on 21st January, 2026. It appears that an appeal has been preferred against the said order on the ground that the Rent Controller has mechanically accepted the evidence adduced by the respondents without an independent evaluation of the bona fide need and without considering the availability of the alternative accommodation with the landlords. It is further alleged that the eviction order was passed without adverting to the statutory provisions available to the tenant under Section 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965.

2. The appeal was preferred on 04th April, 2026.

However, prior thereto, execution proceeding was initiated and it appears that the Execution Court has posted the matter for delivery on 10th April, 2026.

3. At this stage, we are not inclined to pass any orders, save and except to direct the appellate court to dispose of the stay petition in the Rent Control Appeal filed by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible and if a prayer for stay is made in the meantime, the appellate court shall consider such prayer taking into account the fact that the execution petition is pending and in the event the decree is executed, it may likely to cause prejudice to the petitioner.

4. The OP(RC) is disposed of accordingly.

5. However, we make it clear that we have not gone into the merits of the matter and it is for the appellate court to decide whether any stay shall be granted in the facts and circumstances of the case.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top