SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 28466

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
S.MANU, J
BIJOY.M.K – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 15520 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.O.D.SIVADAS
For the Respondents: SRI. AJITH VISWANATHAN, GP

Vehicle seized for alleged illegal sand transport must undergo expert sample testing before final action.

Headnote:The petitioner’s vehicle was intercepted for alleged illegal transportation of river sand under Sections 20 and 21 of the Kerala Protection of River Banks and Regulation of Removal of Sand Act, 2001. No river sand was claimed to be transported, and testing was sought to verify. Court directed sample analysis to determine sand nature. Issues framed around verification of allegations via expert testing, relying on prior judgments. Ratio: Analytical study required before proceeding under the Act; release conditional on test results. Writ petition disposed with directions for sampling, analysis, and decision within two months.

Table of Content
1. vehicle intercepted for illegal river sand transport. (Para 1)
2. petitioner denies river sand; seeks testing. (Para 2)
3. court hears arguments and directs sample analysis. (Para 3)
4. conditional release based on test results within two months. (Para 5)

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is the owner of a goods carriage bearing registration No.KL 13/L 6950. On 01.03.2026, the vehicle was intercepted by police alleging illegal transportation of river sand. Crime No.152 of 2026 was registered under Sections 20 and 21 of the Kerala Protection of River Banks and Regulation of Removal of Sand Act, 2001.

2. According to the petitioner, no river sand was transported in the vehicle. Further, if a sample is collected from the vehicle and tested by the 3rd respondent, the genuineness of the allegation can be revealed. The petitioner relies on the judgment of this Court in WPC No.35486 of 2025 dated 01.12.2025 and submits that he is entitled for an identical treatment at the hands of this Court by issuing similar directions.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.

4. In view of Ext.P3 judgment in WPC No.35486 of 2025 and also of several similar judgments rendered by this Court, I dispose of this writ petition by directing respondents 1 and 2 to take a sample of the sand from the petitioner’s vehicle and subject the same to analytical study to ascertain its nature. It shall be open to the Revenue Divisional Officer to seek assistance of the 3rdrespondent, he being the subject expert. On the basis of the report, the 1strespondent shall take a decision regarding release of the petitioner’s vehicle.

5. It is made clear that, if the sand in the petitioner’s vehicle is found to be river sand, it shall be open to the 1st respondent to proceed against the petitioner in accordance with the provisions of the Kerala Protection of River Banks and Regulation of Removal of Sand Act, 2001. If it is found that the sand in the petitioner’s vehicle is not river sand, the vehicle shall be released to the petitioner on appropriate terms in accordance with law. The exercise as above shall be completed within two months from the date of issuance of a copy of this judgment.

The writ petition is disposed of with the above directions.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top