SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 28478

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
S.MANU, J
BIJOY M.K. – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 47933 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.O.D.SIVADAS
For the Respondents: SMT. V.A HARITHA, GP

Mandate sample testing of seized sand before proceeding under sand removal laws.

Headnote:The petitioner’s vehicle was intercepted for alleged illegal transportation of river sand under Sections 20 and 21 of the Kerala Protection of River Banks and Regulation of Removal of Sand Act, 2001. Petitioner denies transporting river sand and seeks testing of sample by expert. Court finds merit in directing sample analysis to ascertain sand nature, following prior judgments. Issue framed: Whether vehicle should be released without verifying sand type. Ratio: Analytical study of sample required before proceeding under the Act, as held in similar precedents. Writ petition disposed directing respondents to test sand sample and decide vehicle release accordingly within two months.

Table of Content
1. vehicle seized for alleged illegal river sand transport; petitioner denies. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court directs sand sample testing per precedents. (Para 3)
3. release or proceed based on test results within two months. (Para 5)

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is the owner of a goods carriage bearing registration No.KL 44/4111. On 10.10.2025, the vehicle was intercepted by police alleging illegal transportation of river sand. Crime No.1222 of 2025 was registered under Sections 20 and 21 of the Kerala Protection of River Banks and Regulation of Removal of Sand Act, 2001.

2. According to the petitioner, no river sand was transported in the vehicle. Further, if a sample is collected from the vehicle and tested by the 3rd respondent, the genuineness of the allegation can be revealed. The petitioner relies on the judgment of this Court in WPC No.35545 of 2025 dated 01.12.2025 and submits that he is entitled for an identical treatment at the hands of this Court by issuing similar directions.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.

4. In view of Ext.P3 judgment in WPC No.35545 of 2025 and also of several similar judgments rendered by this Court, I dispose of this writ petition by directing respondents 1 and 2 to take a sample of the sand from the petitioner’s vehicle and subject the same to analytical study to ascertain its nature. It shall be open to the Revenue Divisional Officer to seek assistance of the 3rdrespondent, he being the subject expert. On the basis of the report, the 1strespondent shall take a decision regarding release of the petitioner’s vehicle.

5. It is made clear that, if the sand in the petitioner’s vehicle is found to be river sand, it shall be open to the 1st respondent to proceed against the petitioner in accordance with the provisions of the Kerala Protection of River Banks and Regulation of Removal of Sand Act, 2001. If it is found that the sand in the petitioner’s vehicle is not river sand, the vehicle shall be released to the petitioner on appropriate terms in accordance with law. The exercise as above shall be completed within two months from the date of issuance of a copy of this judgment.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top