Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
ANITHA LENIN – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. assessee challenges assessment via appeal and stay petition amid recovery. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court directs stay petition disposal and suspends recovery. (Para 3 , 4) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, who is an assessee under the Income Tax Act, 1965 , has filed Ext.P7 appeal being aggrieved by Ext.P2 assessment order pertaining to the assessment year 2018-2019.
Along with Ext.P8, stay petition was also submitted.
2. Grievance of the petitioner is with regard to the recovery that is being pursued by the respondents, pending consideration of the appeal and the stay petition. This writ petition is submitted in such circumstances.
3. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel for the respondents, I am inclined to dispose of this writ petition.
4. Accordingly, it is ordered that the 4th respondent shall take up Ext.P3 stay petition and pass appropriate orders thereon within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment.
Until such a decision is taken, the recovery proceedings pursuant to Exts.P2, P3, P4, P5 and P6 shall be kept in abeyance.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
