Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. KRISHNA KUMAR, J
SINDHU V.G. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. reliefs sought: quash non-approval, direct appointment sanction. (Para 1) |
| 2. petitioner limits to representation consideration per sc. (Para 2) |
| 3. dispose directing merits order on representation within 4 months. (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
“(i) call for the records relating to Exhibit P3 and set aside the original of the same by the issue of a writ of certiorari or other appropriate writ or order.
(ii) issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ order or direction commanding the 3rd respondent to grant approval to the appointment of the petitioner covered by Exhibit P1.
(iii) issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ order or direction commanding the 2nd respondent to consider and pass order on Exhibit P6 and P6(a).
(iv) issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ order or direction commanding the 1st respondent to consider and pass order on Exhibit P7 with notice to the petitioner within a time limit.
(v) to dispense with filing of English translation of vernacular documents produced along with the writ petition.
(vi) pass such other order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and prope
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
