SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 65908

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
...... – Appellant
Versus
...... – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN &

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.B. SNEHALATHA FRIDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 21ST CHAITHRA, 1947 RP NO. 1275 OF 2024 JUDGMENT DATED 11-11-2024 ARISING FROM : OP (FC) NO.448 OF 2024 REVIEW PETITIONER/RESPONDENT:

XXXX, AGED XXXX YEARS, XXXX.

BY ADVS. KARTHIKA MARIA ARUN THOMAS ANIL SEBASTIAN PULICKEL MATHEW NEVIN THOMAS JOE S. ADHIKARAM KURIAN ANTONY MATHEW SHINTO MATHEW ABRAHAM LEAH RACHEL NINAN VEENA RAVEENDRAN ANJALY ELIAS SHYNI WILLIAM NAVYA SEBY RESPONDENT / PETITIONE R :

XXXX, AGED XXXX YEARS, XXXX.

BY ADV SHARAN SHAHIER THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER Devan Ramachandran, J.

The petitioner seeks that the judgment of this Court dated 11.11.2024 be reviewed; and cites two grounds namely;

a) That he did not agree to the relocation of the children outside India; and that the consent recorded on his behalf was never given;

b) That the copies of the reports of Psychological counselling of the children must be made available to him; based on which alone, he will agree for the children to go abroad.

2. We do no

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top