IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
EASWARAN S., J
ABDUL FAHAD R – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. reliefs sought including quashing rejection of nioc (Para 1 , 2) |
JUDGMENT
The writ petition is filed for the following reliefs:
i) Call for the entire records relating to the above case;
ii) Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, direction or order to quash Ex P10 – rejection order passed by the 2nd respondent as it is wrong, illegal and malafide;
iii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order directing the respondents to issue NIOC to the petitioner as he is not involved in any criminal offence and the false implication of petitioner is quashed by Ex P1 judgment;
iv) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order commanding the respondents to re-consider the petitioner’s application for issuance of NIOC , considering the fact that his implication in crime no: 377/’19 was quashed by this Hon’ble court by Ex P1 judgment as he is not involved in any criminal case , as of now ;
v) Petitioner also prays that this Hon’ble court may be pleased to dispense with the translation of the documents produced in the vernacular language;
vi) Grand such other and further reliefs which this Hon’ble Court fee
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.