IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Kauser Edappagath, J
PRINCE J. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 2547 OF 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parties arguments on bail eligibility (Para 5) |
| 2. reasons for granting bail (Para 6) |
ORDER
This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS), seeking regular bail.
2. The applicant is the accused No.2 in Crime No.201/2026 of Ernakulam Town North Police Station, Ernakulam District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 132, 121(1), 115(2), 118(1), 126(2), 296(b) and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Section 117(e) of the Kerala Police Act, 2011, and Section 3(1) of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on
11.04.2026 at about 05:45 p.m., while police officials were on patrol duty near the North Railway Station over bridge, the accused persons were found in suspicious circumstances and when they were directed to accompany the police, an altercation allegedly ensued during which the police personnel were abused and assaulted and certain damage was caused to the police vehicle and wireless set. Thus, the applicant is alleged to have committed the above offences.
4. I have heard Smt.Anupama Subramanian, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri.K.A. Noushad, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.
5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to bail. On the other hand, the learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicant, and he is not entitled to bail at this stage.
6. The applicant was remanded to judicial custody on 12.04.2026. The investigation is almost over. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. For these reasons, I do not find any reason to hold that the continued detention of the applicant is required for any purpose. Hence, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.
In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions: -
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.