2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 29178
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Viju Abraham, J
NISHA SUJITH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 34368 OF 2025
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Denizen Komath, Dean Denizen Komath
For the Respondents: P.M. Benzir, Anupama Rajendran
Courts may accept withdrawal of writ petitions upon filing of memo when no third-party rights are affected.
Headnote:The judgment pertains to a writ petition filed before the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam. The petitioners sought permission to withdraw the writ petition via a memo. The primary statutory consideration involved the procedural discretion of the court to accept withdrawal requests. The court found no apparent legal impediment in permitting the petitioners to withdraw their case. The court accepted the petitioners' request and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn without imposing any costs or conditions. The central issue framed by the court was whether the petitioners should be permitted to withdraw the writ petition without any adverse consequences. The ratio decidendi establishes that where a party voluntarily seeks withdrawal of a petition and provides a memo to that effect, the court may accept such request as a matter of procedural grace, particularly when no substantive rights of third parties are adversely affected at the preliminary stage. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Back
