SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 29200

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
SOMASEKHARAN MELATH – Appellant
Versus
STATE TAX OFFICER- TPS CIRCLE (EDAPALLY) – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 12084 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: K.N.SREEKUMARAN, P.J.ANILKUMAR
For the Respondents: RAJESH. K.RAJU

Section 16(5) prevails over Section 16(4) allowing input tax credit if returns are filed within the cut-off date.

Headnote:Section 16(5) of the CGST/KSGST Act, 2017 creates a non-obstante provision granting input tax credit where returns are filed by the stipulated cut-off date of 30.11.2021. The petitioner, a registered taxpayer, challenged the denial of input tax credit under an order passed pursuant to Section 73 due to late filing under Section 16(4). The Court determined that since returns were submitted by 01.02.2021, the conditions of Section 16(5) were met.

Table of Content
1. claimant is entitled to input tax credit under statutory deadline extension. (Para 1 , 2)

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is a registered taxpayer under the provisions of the CGST/KSGST Act, 2017. The challenge raised in this writ petition is against Ext.P2 order passed under Section 73 of the CGST/KSGST Act, by which the input tax credit claimed by the petitioner for the period from April 2019 to March 2020 was rejected on the reason that, the petitioner failed to submit the returns within the period stipulated in Section 16(4) of the CGST/KSGST Act.

2. The challenge is raised by the petitioner mainly in the light of Section 16(5) of the CGST/KSGST Act, which provides that, in case the taxpayer is furnishing the returns within the cut-off date contemplated therein, which is 30.11.2021, such taxpayer shall be eligible to claim that tax well. In this case, on going through Ext.P2 impugned order itself, it is clear that, the petitioner had submitted the returns for the relevant months on 01.02.2021. In such circumstances, the petitioner had fulfilled the statutory requirement contemplated under Section 16(5) of CGST/KSGST Act, and hence the petitioner is entitled to the benefit of input tax credit for the period referred above. This is particularly because, Section 16(5) of the CGST/KSGST Act starts with a non-obstante clause as regards Section 16(4) and hence, in case the taxpayer is furnishing the returns within the cut-off date contemplated therein, the timeline contemplated under Section 16(4) would lose its significance.

In such circumstances an interference is required.

Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of, quashing Ext.P2, with a direction to the 1st respondent to reconsider the matter and grant the benefit to the petitioner under Section 16(5) CGST/KSGST Act, if the petitioner is otherwise eligible to the same.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top