IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
VISHNU.V.R – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 2368 OF 2026 | CRIME NO.305/2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the prosecut (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
ORDER
This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS), seeking regular bail.
2. The applicant is the sole accused in Crime No.305/2026 of Nooranadu Police Station, Alappuzha District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 74, 75(1)(i), 75(1) (ii) and 75(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNS).
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the applicant with an intention to outrage the modesty of the defacto complainant, who is his staff by making her believe that she will be paid her salary on 14.04.2026 at 6.30 PM, picked the defacto complainant from the residence of her friend, took her to a place near the house of the applicant and forced her to come to his residence. When the defacto complainant was not willing for the same, the applicant again took her back to the place from where she was picked up and at 6.45 PM on the same day by sitting in the driver seat, the applicant asked for her a kiss and when she declined the same, the applicant hugged her and pressed on her right bossom thereby outraging her modesty. Thus, the applicant has committed the above offences.
4. I have heard Sri.Nireesh Mathew, the learned counsel for the applicant and Smt.Sreeja V., the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.
5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to bail. On the other hand, the learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicant, and he is not entitled to bail at this stage.
6. The applicant was remanded to judicial custody on 18.04.2026. The investigation is almost over. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. For these reasons, I do not find any reason to hold that the continued detention of the applicant is required for any purpose. Hence, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.
In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions: -
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.