Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K.NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, THIRUVALLA – Appellant
Versus
RADHAKRISHNAN C. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background and record of writ petition (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. delay condonation and state arguments (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. validity of overbroad judicial directions (Para 9) |
| 4. final disposal and clarified directions (Para 10) |
SHRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAY, SC, DISTRICT PANCHAYATH PATHANAMTHITTA SHRI.K.SHAJ, SC, KADAMPANAD GRAMA PANCHAYAT SHRI.GEORGIE JOHNY, SC, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY THIS WRIT APPEAL WAS FINALLY HEARD ON 30.03.2026, THE COURT ON 19.05.2026 PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Muralee Krishna, J.
The respondents 5 to 7 in W.P.(C)No.19170 of 2014 filed this writ appeal under Section 5(i) of the Kerala High Court Act, 1958, challenging the judgment dated 11.04.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in that writ petition.
2. Going by the averments in the writ petition, the 1st respondent is the President of the Parents Teacher Association of the 3rd respondent school, and the 2nd respondent is its Managing Committee Member. The 3rd respondent is a lower primary school, situated on 50 cents of land, where nearly 100 students are studying in classes 1 to 4, mainly SC/ST students. In the middle of the courtyard of the school, the respondents 4 and 5, the District Pa
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
