SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 29503

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
NAFEESA PULIYULLA KARAIMBAYIL – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 16464 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: HAROON ASHRAF, MOHAMMAD ISHAAQ, AMJATH T.H., K.T.SAJU, MOHAMMED ISHAQUE.T.T
For the Respondents: AMAL PARTHASARADHY

A petitioner has the right to withdraw a writ petition and may be granted liberty to file a fresh petition for the same cause of action if the court is satisfied with the request.

Headnote:The petitioner filed a petition seeking leave to withdraw the current proceedings with the liberty to institute a fresh petition. The court considered the oral application for withdrawal. The main issue was whether the petitioner could be permitted to withdraw the petition while reserving the right to initiate new legal proceedings. The court exercised its inherent discretion to allow the withdrawal request. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to file a fresh one.

JUDGMENT

The learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one.

Permission is granted. Reserving the aforesaid liberty, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top