Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
L. REMADEVI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge against administrative order issued by district authority. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. requirement to exhaust statutory appellate remedies before judicial intervention. (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT
Petitioner challenges Exhibit-P4 order issued by the District Educational Officer.
2. Petitioner alleges that Exhibit-P4 decision has been taken by the third respondent contrary to Exhibit-P2 order issued by the Government, as well as contrary to Exhibit-P3 decision taken by the Chamavila family regarding the management of Kottappuram High School, Paravoor, Kollam.
3. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader, I am of the view that the impugned order can be challenged before the second respondent, and therefore, jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India need not be invoked.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed, reserving the liberty of the petitioner to pursue the statutory remedy of an appeal.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
