Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
JOBIN SEBASTIAN, J
SHIJU JACOB – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural background and trial history of the criminal assault charges. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. parties argument regarding evidence of official duty performance. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. scope of revisional jurisdiction and assessment of evidence and duty. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. mitigation of sentence based on circumstances of the offense. (Para 17 , 18) |
ORDER
This Criminal Revision Petition has been filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, challenging the judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed against the revision petitioner for the offences punishable under Sections 332, 353, and 506(ii) of the IPC by the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Thodupuzha, as per judgment dated 12.06.2015 in C.C. No.733/2010, which was partly confirmed in appeal by the Additional Sessions Court-III, Thodupuzha, by judgment dated 20.09.2017 in Crl. Appeal No.107/2015. The revision petitioner is the sole accused in the said case.
2. The prosecution case, in brief, is that the accused was allegedly nurturing animosity towards PW1, who was working as a Head Constable attached to the Karimannoor Police Station. While so, th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
