Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
JOBIN SEBASTIAN, J
ABOOBACKER CHETTIMOOLA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of trial court and appellate conviction proceedings. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments regarding chain of custody and procedural sanctity. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court deliberation on evidence integrity and procedural compliance. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
O R D E R
This Criminal Revision Petition has been filed under Sections
397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, challenging the judgment of conviction and the order of sentence passed against the revision petitioner for the offence punishable under Section 8(2) r/w 8(1) of the Abkari Act by the Assistant Sessions Court, Kasaragod as per the judgment dated 14.07.2010 in S.C. No.69/2006, which was confirmed in appeal by the Additional Sessions Court (Ad Hoc)-I, Kasaragod, as per judgment dated 10.08.2011 in Crl. Appeal No.247/2010. The revision petitioner is the sole accused in the said case.
2. The prosecution case is that, on 21.07.2004 at about
7.30 a.m., the accused was found possessing and transporting 900 packets, each containing 100 ml of Karnataka-made arrack, in an autorickshaw bearing Registration No. KL-14-C-281 near Pallamkode Bridge in Adhur Village, in contravention o
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
