Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 29590
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
K. N. ABDUL GAFOOR – Appellant
Versus
KOCHI MUNCIPAL CORPORATION – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 16537 OF 2026
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: BIMAL K.NATH, P.D.SUBRAMANIAN NAMPOOTHIRI, HARIKRISHNAN R., SIDHARTH BIMAL, GOWRI V. NAIR
For the Respondents: ANOOP V NAIR
For the Appellants/Petitioners: BIMAL K.NATH, P.D.SUBRAMANIAN NAMPOOTHIRI, HARIKRISHNAN R., SIDHARTH BIMAL, GOWRI V. NAIR
For the Respondents: ANOOP V NAIR
A petitioner may be granted liberty to withdraw a writ petition with the option to file a fresh petition to ensure all necessary and affected parties are correctly impleaded.
Headnote:The proceedings concern a request by the petitioner to withdraw the current writ petition involving municipal administration and property rights. The underlying matter relates to building permissions and corporate assets involving multiple stakeholders. The court considered the petitioner's specific request for withdrawal with the stated intention of initiating fresh proceedings. The court determined that such procedural liberty is appropriate to ensure necessary parties are joined in the litigation. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner.
JUDGMENT
When this writ petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition impleading all the affected parties.
Liberty granted. Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
