SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 29656

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
GIRISH, J
HIRAN DAVIS – Appellant
Versus
SABY C SEBATAIN – Respondent
RPFC NO.453 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: M.A.SULFIA, ABDUL JALEEL.A
For the Respondents: ANIL PRASAD, C.N.SREEKUMAR, MANJU PAUL, SABU P.JOSEPH, ANILA ANTONY, BEYON T. VARGHESE, AKASH PALLISSERY

Courts may set aside maintenance orders and grant an opportunity to lead evidence if a party was denied the right to present their defense, provided such relief is conditional upon the partial payment of maintenance arrears to protect the interests of the beneficiaries.

Headnote:The Family Court directed the payment of monthly maintenance to the spouse and child. The revision petitioner challenged this order on the grounds that he was denied the opportunity to adduce evidence in his defense after his petition to recall the witness was dismissed. The Court determined that justice requires a fair trial where both parties have the opportunity to present their case. The core issue is whether the impugned order can be sustained if the petitioner was denied the opportunity to lead evidence. The Court held that to ensure a final determination on merits, the petitioner should be granted an opportunity to adduce evidence, provided a portion of the maintenance arrears is deposited as a pre-condition for the rehearing. The revision petition is disposed of by setting aside the impugned order, subject to the deposit of Rs.50,000/- by the petitioner within 30 days, whereupon the Family Court shall conduct a fresh hearing after receiving evidence.

Table of Content
1. challenge to maintenance order due to lack of opportunity to lead evidence. (Para 1 , 2)
2. remand of proceedings conditional on payment of partial arrears to ensure fair trial. (Para 3 , 4)

ORDER

The order passed by the Family Court, Thrissur, on 20.11.2025 in M.C.No.123 of 2024 directing payment of maintenance Rs.12,000/- per month to the 1st respondent and Rs.8,000/- per month to the 2nd respondent from the date of the petition filed for maintenance, is under challenge in this revision petition filed at the instance of the respondent in the aforesaid proceedings.

2. According to the petitioner herein, he was not given an opportunity to adduce evidence in support of his contentions before the Family Court. It is stated that a petition filed by him to recall PW1 was dismissed by the Court below. Thus, it is stated that the impugned order has been passed without considering the objections of the petitioner herein.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents.

4. The impugned order of the Court below would reveal that the petitioner herein, who is the respondent in the M.C., had not adduced any evidence in the aforesaid proceedings. Having regard to the fact that the impugned order was passed by the Court below without considering the evidence which the petitioner proposed to adduce, I deem it appropriate to give an opportunity to the petitioner to adduce evidence before the Family Court, Thrissur, in support of his contentions. However, the petitioner has to deposit a portion of the arrears of maintenance due to the 1st respondent as a pre-condition to allow his request in the above regard.

In the result, the revision petition is disposed of as follows :-

(i) The impugned order dated 20.11.2025 of the Family Court, Thrissur, in M.C.No.123 of 2024, stands set aside subject to the deposit of an amount of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) before the said Court, by the petitioner, within a period of 30 days from today.

(ii) The amount so deposited shall be disbursed to the 1st respondent by the Family Court, Thrissur.

(iii) On deposit of the aforesaid amount by the petitioner herein, the Family Court, Thrissur, shall afford an opportunity to him to adduce evidence in support of his defence against the reliefs sought for by the other side.

(iv) After the completion of the evidence, the Court below shall consider the matter afresh and pass orders on merits after a detailed evaluation of the evidence on record.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top