SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 29719

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G. Girish, J
Rasheed – Appellant
Versus
Superintendent Central Prison And Correctional Center Kannur – Respondent
WP(CRL.) NO. 678 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sunny Mathew
For the Respondents: E.C. Bineesh

Conditions imposed for convict leave that restrict the fundamental right of residency without specific justification and interfere with the ability of co-convicts to avail leave are unreasonable and liable to be set aside.

Headnote:The petitioners challenged specific bail/leave conditions imposed by jail authorities under the authority of constitutional provisions. The case involves an assessment of the reasonableness of conditions, specifically those prohibiting convicts from entering their home jurisdictional limits and restricting coordinated leave for co-accused. The court reviewed the proportionality of these restrictions against the rights of the petitioners to reside with their families during mandated leave periods. The central issue was whether jail authorities could impose blanket restrictions on movement and co-release of convicts during leave periods. The court reasoned that law and order concerns are effectively managed by local police through appropriate arrangements rather than by curtailing the fundamental right of a convict to reside at their home address, finding the specific contested conditions to be unreasonable and excessive. The writ petition was allowed, and the impugned conditions were set aside.

Table of Content
1. challenge to restrictive conditions imposed during convict leave. (Para 1)
2. conditions restricting movement and co-release are unreasonable and encroaching on rights. (Para 2 , 3)

J U D G M E N T

While granting ordinary leave for 30 days to the petitioners herein, who are Convict No.251/23, Convict No.256/23 & Convict No.258/23 respectively, of the Central Prison, Kannur, vide Exts P1 to P3 proceedings, the third respondent imposed eight conditions. The condition No.(1) directing the residence of petitioners outside the limits of Areekode Police Station in Malappuram District during the period of leave, and restricting the entry of the petitioners to the limits of Areekode Police Station, and condition No.(8) restricting the release of the other convicts in the same case while any of those convicts are granted regular leave, are under challenge in this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor representing the State of Kerala.

3. It is apparent that the aforesaid restrictions imposed by the third respondent are unreasonable, and in curtailment of the rights of the petitioners to reside with their families during the period of leave. It appears that the law and order concerns of the authorities were the reason for incorporating those conditions in Exts P1 to P3 proceedings. However, the above concerns are to be tackled by the District Police Chief and the SHO concerned by making appropriate arrangements to avoid any untoward incidents. At any rate, there is no justification in imposing the above conditions curtailing the rights of the petitioners to reside in their homes during the period of leave. Therefore, the prayer in this writ petition deserves to be allowed.

In the result, the writ petition stands allowed as follows:

(i) The condition Nos.(1) & (8) in Exts P1 to P3 proceedings, restricting the entry of the petitioners to the limits of Areekode Police Station in Malappuram District during the period of leave, and barring the release of the other convicts in the same case while anyone of them is granted regular leave, are hereby set aside.

(ii)The petitioners shall be released as per Exts P1 to P3 proceedings, if they comply with the other conditions incorporated thereunder.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top