SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 29745

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.B. Snehalatha, J
Sathi T – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 16906 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Akash S.
For the Respondents: O.M.Shalina, Shameer P.M

The age restrictions under the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, 2021, do not impose a composite age limit on commissioning couples; a woman eligible under the Act may access IVF services using donor gametes even if her husband exceeds the prescribed age limit for male gamete donors.

Headnote:The petitioners, an infertile married couple, challenged the refusal of the respondent hospital to provide In Vitro Fertilisation (IVF) treatment. The 1st petitioner (wife, 46) was within the statutory age limit under Section 21(g) of the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, 2021, but the 4th respondent hospital refused treatment because the 2nd petitioner (husband, 57) exceeded the age limit for men prescribed in the Act. The court considered whether the age limit for men applied to a husband not contributing gametes in a commissioning couple. The central issue was whether the age criteria in Section 21(g) of the Act create a mandatory composite age limit for commissioning couples, or if the age limit for men is only applicable when the husband's gamete is used. Following the precedent in Devayani S. v. Union of India, the court determined that the Act does not prescribe a composite age restriction for married couples. It held that interpreting the statute to exclude married women based on their husband's age would create an unconstitutional and inequitable classification, disadvantaging married women compared to single women. The court permitted the 1st petitioner to undergo IVF procedures using donor gametes at the 4th respondent hospital, subject to the 2nd petitioner's consent.

Table of Content
1. case facts regarding infertility treatment age eligibility. (Para 1)
2. statutory definitions and age requirements within the art act. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)

JUDGMENT

The petitioners are wife and husband. 1st petitioner/ wife is aged 46 years, whereas the 2nd petitioner/husband is aged 57 years. According to them they are undergoing treatment for infertility for a long time. On approaching the 4th respondent hospital, the petitioners were told that the only option for them is to conceive through In Vitro Fertilisation (IVF) procedure using donor sperm. According to the petitioners, though the 1st petitioner who is aged 46, is eligible under the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act 2021 (for short ‘ART Act’) to undergo the said procedure as she is a ‘woman’ defined under Clause 2(u) of the ART Act, the 4th respondent hospital is hesitant to provide them the necessary treatment, citing that the 2nd petitioner has crossed the statutory age limit of 57 years. The case of the petitioners is that though the 2nd petitioner has crossed the age, since the 1st petitioner uses donor sperm and the 2nd petitioner is not an active participant, she is eligible under Section 21(g) of the ART Act to proceed with the treatment as a “woman”, as defined in Clause 2(u) of the ART Act. It is contended by the petitioners that unless the 1st petitioner is permitted to avail ART services by utilising donor male gametes, much hardships would be caused to them.

2. Heard both sides.

3. The grievance of the petitioners is that though the 1st petitioner who is aged 46 and is eligible under Section 21(g) of the ART Act to proceed with the treatment as a “woman” as defined in Clause 2(u) of the ART Act under the 4th respondent hospital is not providing the treatment on the ground that the 2nd petitioner who is her husband has crossed the age limit. Section 2(1)(a) of the ART Act reads as under:

2. Definitions. — (1) In this Act, unless the

context otherwise requires, —

(a) “assisted reproductive technology” with its

grammatical variations and cognate expressions, means all techniques that attempt to obtain a pregnancy by handling the sperm or the oocyte outside the human body and transferring the gamete or the embryo into the reproductive system of a woman;

(b) “assisted reproductive technology bank” means an organisation which shall be responsible for collection of gametes, storage of gametes and embryos and supply of gametes to the assisted reproductive technology clinics or their patients;

XXXXX XXXXXX XXXXX XXXXXX (e) “commissioning couple” means an infertile married couple who approach an assisted reproductive technology clinic or assisted reproductive technology bank for obtaining the services authorised of the said clinic or bank;

XXXXX XXXXX (u) “woman” means any woman above the age of twenty-one years who approaches an assisted reproductive technology clinic or assisted reproductive technology bank for obtaining the authorised services of the clinic or bank.

4. The Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, 2021 came into force on 25.1.2022. It is an Act for the regulation and supervision of the assisted reproductive technology clinics and the assisted reproductive technology banks, prevention of misuse, safe and ethical practice of assisted reproductive technology services for addressing the issues of reproductive health where assisted reproductive technology is required for becoming a parent or for freezing gametes, embryos, embryonic tissues for further use due to infertility, disease or social or medical concerns and for regulation and supervision of research and development and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.

5. Section 2(u) defines ‘woman’ means any woman above the age of twenty-one years who approaches an assisted reproductive technology clinic or assisted reproductive technology bank for obtaining the authorised services of the clinic or bank.

6. Section 21(g) of the ART Act provides that the cli

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top