JUDGMENT

Petitioner claims to be the legal heir of Sri. K. A. Abdulla Haji, who was the managing partner of a firm by the name ‘Pallikara Timbers’. Petitioner alleges that revenue recovery proceedings have been initiated against him, without any basis, for recovery of alleged arrears of rent relating to a lease of Government property allegedly taken by his father. On receipt of Exhibit-P1 revenue recovery notice under Section 7 of the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act, 1968, petitioner submitted Exhibit-P2 objection before the first respondent. Petitioner further submitted that though the objection was filed on 24.03.2026, no orders have been passed, and instead, respondents are proceeding with the revenue recovery notice.

2. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader, I am of the view that this writ petition can be disposed of with a direction to consider and pass appropriate orders on Exhibit-P2 objection in a time bound manner.

3. Accordingly, the