SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 30352

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Gopinath P., J
Shakira Aboobacker – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 17147 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Varghese C. Kuriakose, Amritha J.
For the Respondents: Vishnu J., Abraham P. Meachinkara

The High Court may exercise its discretionary power to grant an installment-based repayment schedule for statutory dues under the 1952 Act, provided such relief does not impede statutory interest, mandatory damages, or active criminal prosecution proceedings.

Headnote:The case involves a challenge regarding the recovery of statutory dues under the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. The petitioner, having an outstanding liability determined under S. 7A, sought judicial intervention to facilitate payment in installments. The Court verified the statutory nature of the dues for the period November 2009 to May 2010. The core issue was whether the Court could grant an installment schedule for the payment of outstanding statutory dues without interfering with ancillary proceedings. The ratio decidendi established that judicial discretion may be exercised to permit payment in installments, provided that such relief does not preclude the recovery of interest under S. 7Q or damages under S. 14B, nor does it extinguish or prejudice pending criminal prosecution proceedings initiated for non-payment. The writ petition stands disposed of, permitting the petitioner to clear the liability of Rs. 4,02,999/- in 24 equal monthly installments, subject to existing statutory interest and damage recovery provisions, and maintaining the viability of ongoing prosecution.

Table of Content
1. court discretion allows installment payments for provident fund dues without hindering parallel legal actions for interest and criminal liability. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)

JUDGMENT The petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to the Provident Fund Department to permit the petitioner to pay off the amounts determined as payable by the petitioner in proceedings under Section 7A of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the 1952 Act’) in some instalments.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the Provident Fund Department submits that the dues relate to the period from November 2009 to May 2010. It is submitted that certain prosecution proceedings were initiated against the petitioner on account of non payment of the dues and it is only that amount for which prosecution was initiated that is mentioned in the present writ petition. It is submitted that the liability of the petitioner under Section 7A of the 1952 Act is Rs.4,02,999/-. It is submitted that if any amount has been paid by the petitioner in the meanwhile, the same can also be adjusted. It is submitted that this order may not prevent the Department from imposing interest under Section 7Q of the 1952 Act or damages under Section 14B of the 1952 Act. It is also submitted that the grant of instalments may also not affect any prosecution proceedings that had already been initiated against the petitioner.

3. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the Provident Fund Department, this writ petition will stand disposed of permitting the petitioner to clear the liability of Rs.4,02,999/- determined under Section 7A of the 1952 Act in 24 equal monthly instalments. Any amount already paid by the petitioner shall be given credit to. The first instalment shall be paid on or before 15.06.2026 and the subsequent instalments shall be paid on or before the 15th day of every succeeding months. It is made clear that this order will not prevent the Provident Fund Department from demanding interest under Section 7Q of the 1952 Act or imposing damages under Section 14B of the 1952 Act. It is also made clear that this order will not prejudice any prosecution proceedings already initiated against the petitioner and such prosecution proceedings shall be taken forward subject to any orders that may be passed by this Court in the application filed for quashing the said proceedings.

The writ petition will stand disposed of as above.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top