2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 30400
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Viju Abraham, J
Jayan M.K – Appellant
Versus
P. Pramoj Sanker – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 2240 OF 2025
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: C.V. Milton
For the Respondents: Deepu Thankan
Contempt of court proceedings are rendered infructuous and may be closed upon the successful implementation and compliance with the underlying court order by the respondent.
Headnote:The petitioner filed a contempt of court case alleging non-compliance with the court's earlier directions in a writ petition. The relevant statute governing contempt proceedings is the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. Upon review, the court was informed by the petitioner's counsel that the judgment in question has been fully complied with by the respondent. Consequently, there remained no further cause of action for the contempt proceedings. The core issue before the court was whether the respondent had willfully disobeyed the court's earlier order. Since the respondent ensured compliance with the previous judgment, the court observed that the purpose of the contempt jurisdiction had been served, warranting the closure of the proceedings. The contempt case is closed.
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the judgment has been complied with and the Contempt Case can be closed.
The said submission is recorded, and the Contempt Case will stand closed.
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
Back
