IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Ziyad Rahman A.A., J
Paravur West Co-Operative Bank Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Income Tax Officer – Respondent
WP(C) No. 17505 of 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. existence of pending stay petitions and resultant threat of recovery proceedings. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. interim directives to keep recovery in abeyance pending disposal of stay applications by the authorities. (Para 3 , 4) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, who is an assessee under the Income Tax Act, 1965, has filed Exts.P3 and P4 appeals being aggrieved by Exts.P1 and P2 assessment orders pertaining to the assessment years 2020-21 and 2024-2025. Along with Exts.P3 and P4 appeals, Exts.P3(a) and P4(a)
stay petitions were also submitted.
2. Grievance of the petitioner is with regard to the recovery that is being pursued by the respondents, pending consideration of the appeals and the stay petitions. This writ petition is submitted in such circumstances.
3. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents, I am inclined to dispose of this writ petition.
4. Accordingly, it is ordered that the 3rd respondent shall take up Ext.P3(a) stay petition and 2nd respondent shall take up Ext.P4(a) stay petition and pass appropriate orders thereon within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment.
Until such a decision is taken, the recovery proceedings pursuant to Exts.P1 and P2 assessment orders shall be kept in abeyance.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.