SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 30432

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G. Girish, J
Manseed – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
WP(CRL.) NO. 793 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: A.Mohammed, Sergi Joseph Thomas
For the Respondents: Santhetharaj N.R.

The High Court has the discretion under Article 226 to grant temporary escort parole to a convict for the purpose of visiting ailing family members, provided such relief is reasonable and compliant with prior judicial guidance.

Headnote:This writ petition is filed under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the respondent prison authorities to grant escort parole for a single day to enable the petitioner, a convict, to visit his ailing parents. The petitioner had previously been granted similar relief in a preceding year. The core issue is whether the convict is entitled to discretionary escort parole for personal visitation under the current circumstances. The court observed that given the nature of the request and the precedent set by a previous order, it is appropriate to grant the relief. The writ petition is allowed, and the respondent is directed to arrange escort parole for one day within three weeks from the receipt of the judgment.

Table of Content
1. petition for escort parole under article 226. (Para 1)
2. reliance on previous judicial orders to grant similar relief. (Para 3)

JUDGMENT

The petitioner, who is the Convict No.322 of the High Security Prison, Viyyur, Thrissur, has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a direction to the second respondent to grant escort parole for one day to him, to visit his ailing parents.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor representing the State of Kerala.

3. As per order dated 07.03.2025 in W.P.(Crl.)No.271/2025, this Court had directed the second respondent to grant escort parole for one day, to enable the petitioner herein to visit his aged old parents. Accordingly, the petitioner is said to have visited his parents last year.

Now, after one year, he craves to have such an opportunity once more.

4. Having regard to the nature of the relief prayed for by the petitioner, I deem it appropriate to allow this writ petition as follows:-

The second respondent is directed to arrange escort parole to the petitioner for one day, to enable him to visit his house and to see his ailing parents. The direction in this regard shall be complied, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. sd/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top