SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 30464

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. V. Balakrishnan, J
Sobha Suresh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Canara Bank – Respondent
OP (DRT) NO. 194 OF 2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: A.S.Dileep, P.Binod, Suseela Dileep, Sudeep Aravind Panicker

A court may dismiss an original petition for non-prosecution when the petitioners fail to appear or provide representation, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the ongoing legal proceedings.

Headnote:The petitioners filed an original petition challenging various securitization measures taken by the respondent Bank. The proceedings involved multiple notices issued under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. The core issue addressed was whether the petitioners could continue to seek relief while failing to appear in court. The court noted that in the absence of any representation on behalf of the petitioners, it appeared that the petitioners were no longer interested in prosecuting the matter. The original petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 21st day of May, 2026 There is no representation for the petitioners.

It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting this matter. Hence this original petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top