SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 30624

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Viju Abraham, J
Jyothishdev J – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 17325 OF 2026



Important Points

The High Court has the jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus directing statutory authorities to dispose of pending revision petitions within a time-bound manner to ensure administrative accountability.

Subject

Service Law - Appointment Approval

Headnote

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a direction for the expeditious disposal of a pending revision petition filed before the government concerning the rejection of the approval of his appointment as an office attendant at an educational institution. The core issue addressed is the delay in processing the revision petition. The court observed that the petitioner has a legitimate expectation for a timely decision on the merits of his grievance regarding his employment status. The court directed the first respondent to consider and decide upon the revision petition within a period of three months, ensuring that both the petitioner and the manager of the school are provided with a reasonable opportunity to be heard.

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: V.A.Muhammed, Presad V.G.
For the Respondents: Haritha V A

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 25th day of May, 2026 Aggrieved by the rejection of approval of appointment of the petitioner as office attendant, Ext.P12 revision is filed before the 1st respondent. Petitioner seeks for an expeditious disposal of the same.

Take into consideration the limited request made by the petitioner, I am inclined to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P12 after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner and the 4th respondent, and a decision in this regard shall be taken within an outer limit of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top