Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Bechu Kurian Thomas, J
K.T Ahammed Rafeek – Appellant
Versus
Registrar Of Partnership Firms – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners seek a writ of mandamus for the processing of statutory partnership modification forms. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. the court directs the completion of ongoing regulatory inquiries instead of issuing direct orders on the underlying merits. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
JUDGMENT
Petitioners seek for the following reliefs:
“1. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction directing the respondents to consider and dispose of Form II and Form V applications as is evidenced by Exhibit P5 to P8 and to take a decision in the time frame fixed by this Court.
2. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction directing the respondents to allow Form II and Form V application.”
2. Petitioners allege that they had, along with the 3rd respondent, entered into a registered partnership deed for the purpose of carrying out the business under the name and style “Fortune Roto Packs”. After six years the partnership, was allegedly reconstituted and the 3rd respondent is alleged to have retired from the firm. However, petitioners allege that for reasons beyond their control, the details of retirement and reconstitution could not be included in the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
