SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 30834

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.Kunhikrishnan, J
Mohammed Rafi M – Appellant
Versus
Revenue Divisional Officer – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 17308 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Jacob Sebastian, Winston K.V, Anu Jacob, Anjana Krishnan, Vincent C. J
For the Respondents: Deepa V

A petitioner has the liberty to withdraw a writ petition filed before the Court at their discretion, leading to its dismissal as withdrawn.

Headnote:The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking relief against the respondents. During the proceedings, the counsel for the petitioner requested permission to withdraw the writ petition. The Court noted the submission and proceeded to dispose of the matter. The issue before the Court was whether the petitioner could be permitted to withdraw the pending writ petition. The Court, observing the request made by the counsel, allowed the withdrawal as the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the case. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

JUDGMENT

The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petitioner may be allowed to withdraw.

Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top