SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 30875

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Ziyad Rahman A.A., J
Ashoka Residency – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner Taxpayer Services Division – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 17139 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: S.Parvathi, T.K.Sreekala, Nikitha Susan Paulson, Uthara Asokan, V.V.Asokan
For the Respondents: Alan Priyadarsi Dev

Recovery proceedings may be stayed by courts in writ jurisdictions when an appeal and stay petition are pending before the competent authority, ensuring the preservation of the subject matter until the appellate authority adjudicates the stay request.

Headnote:The petitioner approached the Court challenging ongoing recovery proceedings initiated by statutory authorities despite a pending appeal and stay petition filed against an assessment order. The court observed that the existence of an active appeal regarding the assessment merits a stay on coercive recovery measures until the appellate authority considers the stay application. The core issue was whether recovery action should proceed during the pendency of a stay application filed along with a statutory appeal. The court reasoned that in the interest of justice and to prevent irreparable prejudice to the assessee, the appellate authority must adjudicate the stay petition within a reasonable timeframe, with recovery proceedings kept in abeyance in the interim. The court directed the appellate authority to dispose of the stay petition within two months and ordered that recovery proceedings be kept in abeyance until the conclusion of that decision.

Table of Content
1. assessment orders and pending appeals regarding tax liabilities. (Para 1 , 2)
2. judicial directives to stay recovery proceedings pending appellate decision. (Para 3 , 4)

JUDGMENT

The petitioner, who is an assessee under the Income Tax Act, 1965, has filed Ext.P2 appeal being aggrieved by Ext.P1 assessment order pertaining to the assessment year 2023-2024. Along with Ext.P3, stay petition was also submitted.

2. Grievance of the petitioner is with regard to the recovery that is being pursued by the respondents, pending consideration of the appeal and the stay petition. This writ petition is submitted in such circumstances.

3. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for the respondents, I am inclined to dispose of this writ petition.

4. Accordingly, it is ordered that the 2nd respondent shall take up Ext.P3 stay petition and pass appropriate orders thereon within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment.

Until such a decision is taken, the recovery proceedings pursuant to Exts.P1 Assessment order and Ext.P4 Demand notice shall be kept in abeyance.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top