SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 30958

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A. Badharudeen, J
Anoop O.P – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
CRL.A NO. 624 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Santharam P
For the Respondents: Alex M Thombra

Upon forfeiture of a bail bond under Section 449 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the court has the judicial discretion to reduce the quantum of the penalty imposed on sureties, even though their primary liability for the forfeited amount remains intact.

Headnote:The appellants, who acted as sureties for an accused in a criminal case, challenged the forfeiture of their bail bond under Section 449 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The trial court had initially imposed a penalty of Rs.1,00,000 against each surety following the non-appearance of the accused. The court found that while production of the accused does not exempt the surety from liability, the court has discretion regarding the quantum of the penalty. Following established precedents, the court analyzed whether leniency could be granted in the amount of the penalty imposed due to the forfeiture of the bond. The ratio decidendi established that once a bond is forfeited, the surety is liable for the amount, but the court retains the authority to exercise mercy and reduce the penalty to prevent undue hardship while ensuring compliance with legal obligations. The appeal was allowed, and the penalty amount was reduced from Rs.1,00,000 each to Rs.35,000 each, subject to payment by the specified date.

Table of Content
1. appellate courts review bail bond forfeiture penalties imposed by trial courts. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. court exercises discretion to reduce penalty amounts for sureties upon bond forfeiture. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 26th day of May, 2026 The sureties for the accused in S.C.No.698/2023 on the files of the Fast Track Special Court, Nadapuram, have filed this appeal under Section 449 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants and the learned Public Prosecutor in detail and perused the order impugned.

3. Precisely stating, the appellants herein stood as sureties for releasing the accused on bail in this case before trial court and thereafter, due to non-appearance of the accused before the trial court, the bail bond executed by the appellants along with the accused has been forfeited.

4. As held in Thundichi v. State of Kerala [2009(4) KLT 67], on forfeiture of the bond, the accused would be produced by the sureties or the accused was later arrested would not save the sureties from paying the forfeited amount of penalty, though leniency in the quantum of penalty can be considered. Thus, the learned counsel for the appellants pleaded mercy in the matter of penalty.

5. The learned Public Prosecutor conceded for reasonable deduction in the penalty pointing out the fact that the actual forfeited amount was Rs.1,00,000/- each.

6. Since reduction of the penalty amount alone is the matter to be considered by this Court, in the interest of justice, the penalty imposed by the court at Rs.1,00,000/- each is reduced to Rs.35,000/- each. There will be a direction to the appellants to pay the amount before the learned Fast Track Special Judge, Nadapuram on or before 08.06.2026. It is specifically made clear that if the penalty will not be remitted within the said period, the appellants are bound to pay the entire amount, covered by the order impugned and the Special Court shall proceed to realise the entire amount of penalty.

This appeal stands allowed as indicated above.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top